Former Trump Attorney John Eastman made a powerful speech Friday night in Michigan regarding the lawfare being used on Trump and his supporters. The large crowd in attendance in Lansing was hosted by the local election integrity group MI Fair Elections. The attorney described the fraud during that time in great detail. The story starts when he gets a call from the White House switchboard.
Eastman thought it was a joke
And he said so, saying, “Steve, what are you doing?” And then the President came on. “I’d like you to represent me. We’re trying to get an action before the Supreme Court of the United States.
Under normal circumstances, this is the call you’ve been waiting for to help your career. Eastman’s daughter took the brief that was filed in the Supreme Court and framed it. It’s still in the office at home.
But it seems something in the wind had changed and you aren’t supposed to question the status quo. You’re not supposed to challenge government, even when it’s blatantly false. You wear your mask and if they change their minds, then that’s what they do.
Eastman saw the need
It’s not right, it’s not American and we need to stand against it. Bill Barr lied. He said there was no evidence of fraud except that the materials he looked at were now exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. You couldn’t get them.
Barr was calling the US Attorney in Pennsylvania Bill McSwain, telling him to stand down and send all materials to the Pennsylvania Attorney General. The Democrats in Philadelphia were stealing an election. You’re handing material to a Democrat AG.
The talking heads, among them CISA, told you it’s the most secure election in history. Eastman’s job was to focus on the illegality so he focused on the constitutionality of it.
Eastman focused
Article 2 is clear, saying that the states shall choose the presidential electors in the manner chosen by, directed by the legislature of the state. The legislatures decide how the electors are chosen.
But since the Civil War, the states have chosen electors by popular vote. The constitutional assignment of authority is how you choose your electors. This is plenary power. The Supreme Court has said only the legislature can change this.
Altering state election laws was illegal. This is federal. That alone made the election invalid.
Eastman checked Wisconsin
Bipartisan teams couldn’t go into nursing homes. This was their law because the elderly can be unduly influenced. Supposedly COVID kept them out, but fish tank cleaners could still go in. A main fraud check was ignored by the state’s Secretary of State. The nursing home turn out rate average went from 20-30% to 100% so fraud happened there.
Many ballots were in the same handwriting but the rallying cry was “There’s no fraud”. There were illegal drop boxes in the state too, both human and an actual box. Democracy in the Park did ballot harvesting in Madison, where the University of Wisconsin is.
Eastman continued
Georgia signature evaluation didn’t happen which violated a couple laws there. In Pennsylvania, there are still 120,000 more ballots cast than there are voters. A truck driver had trucked in 200,000 ballots from Long Island to Philadelphia. He doesn’t know what happened to them.
There was a forensic audit conducted in Atlanta in which the mathematicians would understand the outcome. In one week on one machine, 5,000 ballots were in the same identical sequence. There’s replication or multiple counting happening.
In Colorado, election data was deleted before it should have been. In Michigan there were security breaches. The gentleman in charge, Mr. Alderman, spoke about security concerns til Democrats heard what he was talking about. Now he thinks everything is fine. Alderman testified in Georgia but his information was kept under seal. It’s now been revealed that yes, there were security breaches.
What happened is one of the things we fought a revolutionary war over. You criticized the government, you were in trouble, regardless that it was the truth. In fact currently, the more truth you say, the more you’re prosecuted. If you say something, it will be used against you. At the same time, the court of public opinion is about the only thing that matters now so voices need to be heard.
