Join Amazon Prime for exclusive deals, fast shipping, and endless entertainment! Sign up now!
We have a new major update to the Trump classified documents case.
Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has officially issued a protective order to ensure that all evidence related to the case was properly stored and handled in a secure manner.
In her court document, Judge Cannon found that this case involves information related to national security which requires special precautions with regard to storage, handling, and control of said material.
To protect these interests, she established procedures that must be followed by all parties involved with the case—including the defendant (Trump), defense counsel, and anyone else privy to sensitive information—in order to guarantee a fair trial process without compromising classified data.
In addition, the order has established procedures for disclosing materials to Trump and his legal team in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF).
JUST IN: Judge Cannon has signed an order to govern the handling of classified info in the Trump documents case.
It's the product of a sealed hearing she led yesterday and includes explicit restrictions on what Trump can do with classified info.https://t.co/MfffRg63Vz pic.twitter.com/isAfgMJLPe
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) September 13, 2023
This protective order effectively sets boundaries around how much access Trump has when it comes to reviewing or discussing any evidence related to his case while protecting confidential materials from being exposed or mishandled in any way shape or form during the proceedings.
As for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into allegations concerning attempts to overturn last year’s election results leading up Rep Matt Gaetz threatening Smith over his additional charges against Trump, it appears Paul Sperry believes this will result in either a partial or full dismissal.
This is due largely in part because there wasn’t even an interview conducted with federal agents prior like there should have been according to legal insiders familiar with the matter alongside what seems largely like inflammatory rhetoric used by Smith as opposed substantial evidence presented in his indictment papers back on January 6th.
One such example was his reliance on an emoji email sent regarding camera footage which was never actually destroyed according to unknown sources.
