Facebook’s answer to President Donald Trump’s popularity is to censor everything that sheds doubt on the evil New World Order agenda. After Mark Zuckerberg was instructed to draw a line in the sand and start breaking the news that it’s normal for an election to drag on for weeks or months after the polls close, he sent a minion out to warn users on Wednesday, that anyone questioning the “integrity” of the election will be censored. Doubting the liberal logic on Covid-19 will get you fact-checked in the blink of an eye. It’s no wonder the Senate Commerce Committee wants to drag the social media CEO’s up on Capitol Hill for yet another grilling.
Censor everything that liberals don’t like
“Big Tech,” Senator Ted Cruz believes, “poses the single greatest threat to free speech in our day, and the single greatest threat to democracy in our day. It should speak volumes that every member of our committee just voted to issue these subpoenas.” The names Sundar Pichai, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jack Dorsey appear on those writs. Facebook, Google and Twitter have some “splainin” to do. They even censor and fact check obvious harmless jokes along with what they perceive as “misinformation” because it presents the opposing point of view. It looks a lot like a civil war is brewing over the outcome of the election and the forces of darkness aren’t happy folks are talking about it.
The latest outrage came on Wednesday when Facebook declared the platform “will not accept ads that seek to delegitimize the results of the 2020 U.S. election or that speculate voting will lead to illegitimate outcomes.” You can’t even “speculate” about it or they will censor you. While attacking commercial accounts with “an update to an existing ad policy that addresses premature claims of electoral victory,” Facebook also declared “ads that make claims of widespread voter fraud or that certain forms of voting — such as mail-in ballots — will lead to fraudulent results are not permitted.”
The propaganda ministry has clearly stated that “This would include calling a method of voting inherently fraudulent or corrupt, or using isolated incidents of voter fraud to delegitimize the result of an election.” That means even hinting that UNSOLICITED ballots may lead to abuse or VALID reports of ACTUAL CRIMES which have already occurred is VERBOTEN! This particular “policy” is focused on ads, but the “organic content created by users” doesn’t get a pass. They have special censor blocks for you too.
A contextual label
From now on, Facebook will censor anyone who posts anything “making similar claims” to the ideas banned in ads. When they catch you questioning authority, “Facebook applies a contextual label,” company spokesman Andy Stone explains, noting the order came down from the big Z himself in “a September 3 blog post.” Tucker Carlson took issue with one of those recently.
Facebook and the other tech giants love to censor conservatives. As Fox host Tucker Carlson made the subject of an entire monologue, they “have engaged in a troubling pattern of censoring speech surrounding major issues.” He got banged hard for suggesting Covid-19 was cooked up in a lab. Facebook grayed out a video of his guest, “Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan” because Facebook knows more about the virus than she does. Her credentials don’t matter to the FB Gestapo. Her crime was daring to vocalize that she has “evidence showing China ‘intentionally’ released COVID-19 onto the general population.”
“Within a few hours of her interview last night,” Carlson relates, “a video of the segment reached 1.3 million people on Facebook.” The social media giant quickly “suppressed the video.” They decided to censor it with warning labels unfairly discrediting it. Company executives “made it harder for users to watch our segment. Those who found the video had to navigate a warning that the interview ‘repeats information about COVID-19 that independent fact-checkers say is false.” Their subsidiary Instagram did the same. Twitter actually “suspended Dr. Yan’s account entirely. It did not explain why.” As Carlson pointed out, “Nor did the tech companies explain how they would know more about disease transmission than an MD, PhD virologist like Dr. Li-Meng Yan.”
Carlson then noted a few even spookier things about the way the fact checkers chose to censor him. “if you clicked on the provided links, you’d notice something odd. The fact checks were all published months ago, many months — in January, February, and March, and they had nothing whatsoever to do with what Dr. Li-Meng Yan said on our show. One of the fact checks attacks a completely unrelated claim.”